법조 제75권 제3호(통권 제777호) 판례평석 - 444 - aprchId=BUT0000076&sysCd=SCD04>, (최종방문일: 2026. 5. 21.). 일본 특허청심판부 편, 『심판편람(갱신일, 2025. 12. 11.)』. <https://www.jpo.go.jp/system/trial_appeal/sinpan-binran.html>, (최종방문일: 2026. 5. 21.). <외국문헌> 審判部 審判課 審判企画室 課長補佐 田口 傑, “平成23年改正特許法における無効審判及び訂正審判の運用につ いて”, 特許技術懇話会誌(제267호), tokugikon (2012. 11.). Brooke M. Wilner & Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D., Insights from the First Year of the USPTO's New Motion to Amend Pilot Program, 20 Chi.-Kent J. Intell. Prop. 128 (2021). Colleen Chien, Christian Helmers & Alfred Spigarelli, Inter Partes Review and the Design of Post-Grant Patent Reviews, 33 Berk. TECH. LAW J. 817 (2019). Chris Hamer & David Miller, Claim Requests, and Other EPO Pitfalls, 226 Managing Intell. Prop. 44 (2013). Jennifer R. Turchyn, Improving Patent Quality Through Post-Grant Claim Amendments: A Comparison of European Opposition Proceedings and U.S. Post-Grant Proceedings, 114 Mich. L. Rev. 1497 (2016). Joe Matal, A Guide to the Legislative History of the America Invents Act: Part I of II, 21 Fed. Cir. B.J. 435 (2012). Matthew Johnson, Daniel C. Sloan & Adam J. Cook, Motions to Amend: Have the Changes Made by the Uspto’s Pilot Program Resulted in More Favorable Outcomes for Patent Owners?, 24 Chi.-Kent J. Intell. Prop. 138 (2025). Tyler R. Bowen & Katherine Nesler, The Impact of the PTAB’s Motion to Amend Pilot Program, Perkins Coie LLP (2020). USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board Motion to Amend (MTA) Study Update through March 31, 2024. Lionel M. Lavenue, Behind Bars: A Closer Look at the Statutory Bars for Filing Inter Partes Review Petitions, May/June 2013. <https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/articles/behind-bars-a-closer-look-at-the -statutory-bars-for-filing-inter.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com>, (최종방문일: 2026. 5. 18.).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODExNjY=